Triple

T690343
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Canarian Spanish E13376 entity
Predicate orthography P12752 FINISHED
Object standard Spanish orthography LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standard Spanish orthography | Statement: [Canarian Spanish, orthography, standard Spanish orthography]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: orthography
Context triple: [Canarian Spanish, orthography, standard Spanish orthography]
  • A. hasOrthographicReform
    Indicates that an entity has undergone or is associated with a change or standardization in its writing system or spelling conventions.
  • B. hasOfficialOrthography
    Indicates that an entity has a formally recognized and standardized system for writing its language or name.
  • C. orthographicProperty chosen
    Indicates a relationship where a specific written or spelling-related characteristic is attributed to or associated with an entity.
  • D. hasStandardOrthographySince
    Indicates that a language or writing system has used a particular standardized orthography starting from a specified point in time.
  • E. effectOnSpelling
    Indicates a relationship where one factor influences or alters the way something is spelled.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933e0f98819097d22766c49b61b8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a0ad379c81909003d35c63822780 completed March 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d221d38819083c0adda81f59b07 completed March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.