Triple

T690280
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject William Marbury E13375 entity
Predicate legalCaseRole P16985 FINISHED
Object plaintiff LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plaintiff | Statement: [William Marbury, legalCaseRole, plaintiff]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseRole
Context triple: [William Marbury, legalCaseRole, plaintiff]
  • A. legalProfessionRole
    Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific professional role within the legal domain in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. judicialRole
    Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific official function or position within the judicial system in relation to another entity or legal matter.
  • C. legalCase
    Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
  • D. legalRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
  • E. petitionerRole
    Indicates the role or capacity in which a petitioner is acting within a legal or formal proceeding.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933e0f98819097d22766c49b61b8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a0ad379c81909003d35c63822780 completed March 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d221d38819083c0adda81f59b07 completed March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a49dc0e6a08190b81d82a6f2571c41 completed March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.