Triple

T690059
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Prince of Wales E13371 entity
Predicate style P87 FINISHED
Object His Royal Highness E21941 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: His Royal Highness | Statement: [Prince of Wales, style, His Royal Highness]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: His Royal Highness
Context triple: [Prince of Wales, style, His Royal Highness]
  • A. His Royal Highness chosen
    His Royal Highness is a formal style used to address or refer to certain members of a royal family, typically princes and princesses.
  • B. His Majesty
    His Majesty is the formal style of address used for a reigning male British monarch.
  • C. Her Imperial Highness
    Her Imperial Highness is the formal honorific style used for female members of certain imperial families, signifying their high rank and status within the monarchy.
  • D. Her Majesty
    Her Majesty is the formal royal style used to address or refer to a reigning queen such as Anne, Queen of Great Britain.
  • E. His Imperial Majesty
    "His Imperial Majesty" is a formal honorific style traditionally used to address or refer to a reigning emperor, particularly in the context of the Holy Roman Empire.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933e0f98819097d22766c49b61b8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a0ad379c81909003d35c63822780 completed March 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a64a53c068819089e66347da55710b completed March 3, 2026, 2:41 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.