Triple
T6889388
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amy Madigan |
E159006
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Roe vs. Wade |
E1209
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roe vs. Wade | Statement: [Amy Madigan, notableWork, Roe vs. Wade]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Roe vs. Wade Context triple: [Amy Madigan, notableWork, Roe vs. Wade]
-
A.
Roe v. Wade
chosen
Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion, profoundly shaping American law and politics until it was overturned in 2022.
-
B.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the federal constitutional right to abortion.
-
C.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
-
D.
Dobbs
Dobbs is the middle name of Richard Dobbs Spaight, a Founding Father who signed the U.S. Constitution and served as Governor of North Carolina.
-
E.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6883568c8819081db6407e892cccc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d9117c84819093dad7b765337b63 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c742e71bcc81908231a861be47b7db |
completed | March 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:23 p.m.