Triple

T6851040
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Formula One Management E158013 entity
Predicate roleRelativeToFIA P72616 FINISHED
Object commercial rights holder LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: commercial rights holder | Statement: [Formula One Management, roleRelativeToFIA, commercial rights holder]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleRelativeToFIA
Context triple: [Formula One Management, roleRelativeToFIA, commercial rights holder]
  • A. roleAtD.C.United
    Indicates that an entity holds or held a specific role or position within the D.C. United soccer organization.
  • B. appointedRelative
    Indicates that one entity has formally assigned or designated another entity, who is a relative, to a specific role, position, or responsibility.
  • C. hasRelativeRole
    Indicates that one entity holds a familial or kinship-based role in relation to another entity.
  • D. actsOnBehalfOf
    Indicates that one entity performs actions or makes decisions as a representative or proxy for another entity.
  • E. appointedOnBehalfOf
    Indicates that an appointment or designation is made by one party acting in representation of, or for the benefit of, another party.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6882fae988190864cbba788c5ebb4 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d84c45708190918adfc028252400 completed March 27, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d0a12834819097d7e6c0b823745e completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6d1668a7c8190ae93951f9ba2df10 completed March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:20 p.m.