Triple

T6845121
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Autauga County E157874 entity
Predicate hasMixedLandUse P24917 FINISHED
Object rural and small-town communities LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rural and small-town communities | Statement: [Autauga County, hasMixedLandUse, rural and small-town communities]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMixedLandUse
Context triple: [Autauga County, hasMixedLandUse, rural and small-town communities]
  • A. hasUrbanRuralMix chosen
    Indicates that something exhibits a combination or blend of both urban and rural characteristics or components.
  • B. hasLandOwnershipMix
    Indicates that an entity has a particular combination or distribution of different types of land ownership (e.g., public, private, communal) associated with it.
  • C. landUseIncludes
    Indicates that a specified land area contains or permits the specified type(s) of land use within its boundaries.
  • D. hasLandUseCharacter
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular type or pattern of land use.
  • E. landUseContext
    Indicates the contextual setting or circumstances under which a particular piece of land is used or designated for a specific purpose.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6882ed4c081909dc465a7cf8838be completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d6b8627081908e34d2b942d08aef completed March 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d09f90648190bc0a462c7d59de1b completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:19 p.m.