Triple
T6833345
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | i |
E157389
|
entity |
| Predicate | appearsInIdentity |
P72952
|
FINISHED |
| Object | e^{iπ} + 1 = 0 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: e^{iπ} + 1 = 0 | Statement: [i, appearsInIdentity, e^{iπ} + 1 = 0]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appearsInIdentity
Context triple: [i, appearsInIdentity, e^{iπ} + 1 = 0]
-
A.
appearsAs
Indicates that one entity is presented, perceived, or manifested in the form, role, or guise of another entity.
-
B.
identityRevealedIn
Indicates that an entity’s true identity becomes known or disclosed within a specified context, source, or situation.
-
C.
appearsFor
Indicates that one entity is presented, shown, or made visible on behalf of, or in representation of, another entity.
-
D.
hasSecretIdentity
Indicates that an entity possesses an alternate, hidden identity that is not publicly known.
-
E.
knowsSecretIdentityOf
Indicates that one entity is aware of the hidden or private true identity of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6882c53608190b99aebef079b23bd |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d62b1e8c8190a81d91191a54b073 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d09d95f0819091ca7f897dc21efe |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6d11fab808190b18160ff3829fcc6 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:18 p.m.