Triple
T682304
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Imperial Estates |
E13208
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadRight |
P17486
|
FINISHED |
| Object | territorial authority |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: territorial authority | Statement: [Imperial Estates, hadRight, territorial authority]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadRight Context triple: [Imperial Estates, hadRight, territorial authority]
-
A.
heldRight
Indicates that one entity is being held on the right side of another entity.
-
B.
has
Indicates that one entity possesses, owns, contains, or includes another entity as part of its state or composition.
-
C.
hadFort
Indicates that an entity possessed, controlled, or contained a fort at some time.
-
D.
have
Indicates that one entity possesses, owns, or contains another entity or attribute.
-
E.
heldThat
Indicates that an entity (often a person or authority) maintained, asserted, or concluded that a particular proposition or judgment is true.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933e0f98819097d22766c49b61b8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a06f9ee88190a2d757aacd8e3f5b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d1f0ccc819088c1527beabcb718 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a49df19c9481909cc9bc33ed7f011b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.