Triple
T6809722
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Western Maharashtra |
E156598
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCooperativeType |
P19448
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sugar cooperative |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sugar cooperative | Statement: [Western Maharashtra, hasCooperativeType, sugar cooperative]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCooperativeType Context triple: [Western Maharashtra, hasCooperativeType, sugar cooperative]
-
A.
hasCooperative
Indicates that one entity participates in a cooperative relationship or partnership with another entity.
-
B.
cooperationType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or form of cooperative relationship that exists between the related entities.
-
C.
isCollaboration
Indicates that two or more entities are jointly working together toward a shared goal or producing something in partnership.
-
D.
definesCooperationWith
Indicates that one entity formally specifies or establishes the terms, scope, or nature of cooperative interaction with another entity.
-
E.
hasPartnershipType
Indicates the specific kind or category of partnership relationship that exists between entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68828b26c819090fe9df7612bbc27 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d30c741881909e220b05aa564bc2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d09bb4f881909bf20c188cb3e8e1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:16 p.m.