Triple
T6775650
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hobart-class destroyer |
E155146
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasElectronicWarfareCapability |
P34751
|
FINISHED |
| Object | electronic support measures |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: electronic support measures | Statement: [Hobart-class destroyer, hasElectronicWarfareCapability, electronic support measures]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasElectronicWarfareCapability Context triple: [Hobart-class destroyer, hasElectronicWarfareCapability, electronic support measures]
-
A.
hasElectronicWarfareSystem
chosen
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or incorporates an electronic warfare system.
-
B.
hasFireMissionCapability
Indicates that an entity possesses the ability to plan, coordinate, or execute fire missions (such as artillery or indirect fire support) as part of combat operations.
-
C.
warfareCapability
Indicates the ability or capacity of an entity to engage in, conduct, or support acts of warfare.
-
D.
weaponCapability
Indicates that one entity has the ability to use, deploy, or function as a weapon against another entity or target.
-
E.
operationalCapability
Indicates the ability or readiness of an entity to perform a specific function, task, or operation effectively under defined conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68812ef7c819099369f51febb725c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d24f77c88190be21cf4ef132aa31 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d094105881909c5806eb4afa6306 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:13 p.m.