Triple
T677000
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thomas Dudley |
E13099
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dudley |
E21380
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dudley | Statement: [Thomas Dudley, familyName, Dudley]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dudley Context triple: [Thomas Dudley, familyName, Dudley]
-
A.
Dudley
Dudley is a large industrial town in England’s West Midlands, historically known for its role in the Black Country and its prominent castle and zoo.
-
B.
Dudley
chosen
Dudley is a masculine given name of English origin that has been borne by various notable figures in literature, politics, and entertainment.
-
C.
Leyland
Leyland is a town in Lancashire, England, historically known for its vehicle manufacturing industry, particularly Leyland Motors.
-
D.
Tavistock
Tavistock is a historic market town in Devon, England, known for its medieval abbey remains and association with the Russell family, Dukes of Bedford.
-
E.
Hylton
Hylton is the defendant in the landmark 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case Ware v. Hylton, which addressed the supremacy of federal treaties over conflicting state laws.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933d3bf88190972041cd8cf143b9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a04b2ae881908a5c23453bef8572 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a76d6cdc9c81909eb3240c00fa530d |
completed | March 3, 2026, 11:23 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.