Triple
T6763821
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tatra County |
E154663
|
entity |
| Predicate | administrativeSeat |
P21613
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Zakopane |
E24091
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zakopane | Statement: [Tatra County, administrativeSeat, Zakopane]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Zakopane Context triple: [Tatra County, administrativeSeat, Zakopane]
-
A.
Zakopane
chosen
Zakopane is a popular resort town in southern Poland, known as the country's "winter capital" and a gateway to the Tatra Mountains.
-
B.
Karpacz
Karpacz is a popular mountain resort town in southwestern Poland, known for skiing, hiking, and its location at the foot of Śnieżka in the Sudetes.
-
C.
Jelenia Góra
Jelenia Góra is a historic city in southwestern Poland, known for its picturesque setting in the Karkonosze Mountains and its well-preserved old town architecture.
-
D.
Rzeszów
Rzeszów is a major city in southeastern Poland known as an important economic, academic, and cultural center of the region.
-
E.
Świdnica
Świdnica is a historic town in southwestern Poland known for its well-preserved medieval architecture and the UNESCO-listed Church of Peace.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c688109c1c8190added9a221292af0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d217bbfc81908c9e55efaf7f8594 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:53 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c71a7b50388190b380f20f0213f0e5 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:12 p.m.