Triple
T670946
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | House simple resolution |
E12968
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayBeUsedFor |
P98
|
FINISHED |
| Object | establishing a select committee |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: establishing a select committee | Statement: [House simple resolution, mayBeUsedFor, establishing a select committee]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeUsedFor Context triple: [House simple resolution, mayBeUsedFor, establishing a select committee]
-
A.
usedFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
-
B.
canBeUsedOver
Indicates that one entity is suitable or valid for use in place of, or in relation to, another entity.
-
C.
eligibleUses
Indicates the types of actions, purposes, or contexts in which something is permitted or qualified to be used.
-
D.
canUse
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or suitability to make use of another entity or resource.
-
E.
isUsedAs
Indicates that one entity serves a particular function, role, or purpose as another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493355dec819098d4244b2fa34885 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a1b3682c8190a9b9a454480c3446 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d1a16c48190af89e3b078a4957e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.