Triple
T6650174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Granada Television |
E150799
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedBrandOnScreenUntil |
P72068
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2004 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2004 | Statement: [Granada Television, usedBrandOnScreenUntil, 2004]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedBrandOnScreenUntil Context triple: [Granada Television, usedBrandOnScreenUntil, 2004]
-
A.
usedBrand
Indicates that an entity has utilized, applied, or operated a particular brand in some context.
-
B.
usedBrandOf
Indicates that one entity made use of or operated an item, product, or service associated with a particular brand.
-
C.
usesBrandCharacter
Indicates that one entity employs or features another entity’s brand character (such as a mascot or branded persona) in its materials, products, or communications.
-
D.
usedInBrand
Indicates that something (such as a component, material, or element) is utilized as part of or within a particular brand.
-
E.
usesBrandColor
Indicates that one entity applies or displays another entity’s official brand color in its appearance, design, or materials.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687f2c9508190a60b9aad31d3f358 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6cc9c6cb0819084fec8e0beb430de |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6ad04d66c8190926ffcbff372643b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6cc988c0081909d22b86ca299331c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:01 p.m.