Triple

T6645549
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Palorchestes E150689 entity
Predicate evolutionaryPattern P55597 FINISHED
Object example of convergent evolution with placental tapirs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: example of convergent evolution with placental tapirs | Statement: [Palorchestes, evolutionaryPattern, example of convergent evolution with placental tapirs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evolutionaryPattern
Context triple: [Palorchestes, evolutionaryPattern, example of convergent evolution with placental tapirs]
  • A. evolutionaryDescription chosen
    Indicates how an entity has changed, adapted, or developed over time through evolutionary processes.
  • B. evolutionaryPhase
    Indicates the stage or period an entity is in within a broader process of gradual development or evolution.
  • C. evolves
    Indicates that one entity undergoes a process of gradual change or development into another, typically more advanced or different, state or form.
  • D. designEvolution
    Indicates how the design of an entity changes, develops, or is refined over time or across versions.
  • E. successionPattern
    Indicates the characteristic way in which one entity follows, replaces, or is ordered after another in a sequence or succession.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c687f1a3048190828b7342f7125d5c completed March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6cc9c6cb0819084fec8e0beb430de completed March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6ad04d66c8190926ffcbff372643b completed March 27, 2026, 4:15 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2 p.m.