Triple

T66243
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SecDef E1320 entity
Predicate isPrincipalAdvisorOn P4478 FINISHED
Object defense policy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defense policy | Statement: [SecDef, isPrincipalAdvisorOn, defense policy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPrincipalAdvisorOn
Context triple: [SecDef, isPrincipalAdvisorOn, defense policy]
  • A. hasStakeholder
    Indicates that an entity is a stakeholder of another entity, typically having an interest, involvement, or influence in its activities or outcomes.
  • B. hasTeachingAuthority
    Indicates that one entity possesses the recognized power or right to teach, instruct, or provide formal education to another entity or within a specific context.
  • C. isHeadOf
    Indicates that one entity holds the leading or principal authority position over another entity, such as an organization, group, or department.
  • D. hasProvost
    Indicates that an institution or organization has a specific person serving in the role of provost.
  • E. isAssociatedWith
    Indicates that there exists a connection, relationship, or involvement between two entities without specifying its exact nature.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24ba4f760819081f6638a3c70538a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2516eda54819090f5c14384d4eab1 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24ea5c140819080409a968c8d2ce8 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2516d98e88190b79261bd3fcadd9b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:02 a.m.