Triple
T6607761
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Beagle conflict |
E149159
|
entity |
| Predicate | primaryLegalInstruments |
P9087
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Boundary treaties between Argentina and Chile |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Boundary treaties between Argentina and Chile | Statement: [Beagle conflict, primaryLegalInstruments, Boundary treaties between Argentina and Chile]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryLegalInstruments Context triple: [Beagle conflict, primaryLegalInstruments, Boundary treaties between Argentina and Chile]
-
A.
usedLegalInstrument
Indicates that one party employed or relied upon a specific legal instrument (such as a contract, statute, or court order) in the context of an action or relationship with another party.
-
B.
legalForm
Indicates the specific legal structure or organizational type under which an entity is formally constituted and recognized by law.
-
C.
hasLegalInstrument
chosen
Indicates that there exists a formal legal document or instrument that establishes, governs, or records the relationship between the related entities.
-
D.
legalInstrumentAbbreviation
Indicates that one legal instrument is an abbreviated or shortened form of the name or citation of another legal instrument.
-
E.
legalSignificance
Indicates that something has recognized importance, effect, or consequence within a legal context or system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687eaa7508190bb58ce2aa02039b3 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6cf3796d08190a26e988386089447 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6acfed25481909cac74c84a9fe088 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:57 p.m.