Triple
T6603402
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mono Lake |
E149055
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalCase |
P3010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | National Audubon Society v. Superior Court (Mono Lake case) |
E355026
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: National Audubon Society v. Superior Court (Mono Lake case) | Statement: [Mono Lake, hasLegalCase, National Audubon Society v. Superior Court (Mono Lake case)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Audubon Society v. Superior Court (Mono Lake case) Context triple: [Mono Lake, hasLegalCase, National Audubon Society v. Superior Court (Mono Lake case)]
-
A.
Mono Lake water rights litigation
chosen
Mono Lake water rights litigation refers to the series of landmark legal battles over Los Angeles’s diversion of water from the Mono Basin, which reshaped California water law by strengthening public trust protections for environmental resources.
-
B.
Hetch Hetchy water rights controversy
The Hetch Hetchy water rights controversy was an early 20th-century environmental and political battle over damming a Yosemite valley to supply water to San Francisco, helping to define the modern American conservation movement.
-
C.
Kivalina v. ExxonMobil
Kivalina v. ExxonMobil is a landmark U.S. climate change lawsuit in which an Alaskan village sued major energy companies for damages allegedly caused by global warming and resulting coastal erosion.
-
D.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
-
E.
Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council
Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal agencies’ obligations under NEPA, holding that the Act requires thorough environmental impact analysis but not the adoption of any particular mitigation measures.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687eaa7508190bb58ce2aa02039b3 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6af11f0788190be010c6ee60e150c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c6e43860f081908fbf1ec65bdad940 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:56 p.m.