Triple
T6564948
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Raga |
E153879
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasComplexVerbMorphology |
P48763
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Raga, hasComplexVerbMorphology, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasComplexVerbMorphology Context triple: [Raga, hasComplexVerbMorphology, true]
-
A.
hasVerbAspect
Indicates that a verb or verbal expression is associated with a particular grammatical aspect (such as perfective, imperfective, or progressive) describing the temporal structure of the action or state.
-
B.
hasComplex
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is part of a larger composite structure or complex formed with another entity.
-
C.
hasVerbClass
Indicates that an action or event is categorized into a specific verb class based on its grammatical or semantic behavior.
-
D.
hasVerbalFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific verbal property, characteristic, or behavior related to speech or language.
-
E.
hasInfinitiveVerbEnding
Indicates that a verb takes the infinitive form with a specific infinitive verb ending (such as “-to” in English or “-en” in German).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880cb35881909b763eb0125236b9 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6cc9c6cb0819084fec8e0beb430de |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6acf93cb48190b54f5dd6febd34dc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:52 p.m.