Triple
T654606
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edsel |
E11618
|
entity |
| Predicate | reasonForFailure |
P6667
|
FINISHED |
| Object | recessionary economic conditions in late 1950s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recessionary economic conditions in late 1950s | Statement: [Edsel, reasonForFailure, recessionary economic conditions in late 1950s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForFailure Context triple: [Edsel, reasonForFailure, recessionary economic conditions in late 1950s]
-
A.
reasonForDecline
chosen
Indicates the explanation or cause given for why something was rejected, reduced, or not accepted.
-
B.
missionFailure
Indicates that an attempted mission or operation did not achieve its intended objectives or outcome.
-
C.
reasonForElimination
Indicates the specific cause or justification for why an entity was removed, disqualified, or excluded from consideration.
-
D.
originalReason
Indicates the initial cause, motivation, or justification behind an action, decision, or state of affairs.
-
E.
reasonForConflict
Indicates that one entity is the cause, motive, or underlying issue leading to a conflict involving another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4932862a0819098be659c814e4981 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49f4bb5b881908a18b5ec1c94e0cf |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d121cec81909986c91291bb4ca8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.