Triple
T652625
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Binding of Isaac |
E11376
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDoctrinalSignificance |
P15112
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jewish liturgy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jewish liturgy | Statement: [Binding of Isaac, hasDoctrinalSignificance, Jewish liturgy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDoctrinalSignificance Context triple: [Binding of Isaac, hasDoctrinalSignificance, Jewish liturgy]
-
A.
doctrinalStatus
Indicates the formal standing or classification of a belief, teaching, or doctrine within a particular religious or ideological system.
-
B.
doctrinalEmphasis
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a doctrine, belief system, or teaching is given particular focus, priority, or stress within a religious, ideological, or organizational context.
-
C.
doctrinalStance
Indicates the specific set of doctrines, beliefs, or official teachings that an entity adheres to or promotes.
-
D.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
-
E.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493266a2881909daf4c40f719dee8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49f4a660c8190b887cb4da01ef7ae |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d1001088190aa7ca3c8f2ad0e32 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.