Triple

T6517429
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Cow E148299 entity
Predicate containsLegalRulingsOn P28367 FINISHED
Object prayer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: prayer | Statement: [The Cow, containsLegalRulingsOn, prayer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsLegalRulingsOn
Context triple: [The Cow, containsLegalRulingsOn, prayer]
  • A. legalRulingNature
    Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
  • B. hasLegalRelevanceIn
    Indicates that something is legally significant, applicable, or has consequences within a specified legal context, case, or jurisdiction.
  • C. hasRulingInFiqh
    Indicates that a subject has an associated legal ruling or judgment within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh).
  • D. judgmentInvolves
    Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
  • E. jurisprudenceDiscussedIn chosen
    Indicates that a topic, issue, or principle of jurisprudence is examined, analyzed, or debated within a particular document, discussion, or source.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c687e68e748190baceb9298f32d3ed completed March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6ac0ece2081909c14accef90efd7c completed March 27, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c68ab98c78819081743e614df04e1d completed March 27, 2026, 1:48 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:44 p.m.