Triple

T650197
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Red 1 E11328 entity
Predicate planningResponsibility P636 FINISHED
Object display sequence planning LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: display sequence planning | Statement: [Red 1, planningResponsibility, display sequence planning]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: planningResponsibility
Context triple: [Red 1, planningResponsibility, display sequence planning]
  • A. responsibleFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
  • B. planner
    Indicates that an entity is responsible for organizing, scheduling, or coordinating activities, tasks, or resources.
  • C. plannedUnder
    Indicates that one entity has been scheduled, organized, or arranged to occur within the scope, authority, or framework of another entity.
  • D. planningDocument
    Indicates that an entity serves as or is associated with a document created for planning or outlining future actions, strategies, or activities.
  • E. planned
    Indicates that an entity has intentionally arranged or scheduled another entity or event to occur in the future.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493266a2881909daf4c40f719dee8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49f31e70c81909a2ac1d939f7ec07 completed March 1, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d0eade081909c47e85ed55f808d completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.