Triple

T650196
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Red 1 E11328 entity
Predicate safetyResponsibility P636 FINISHED
Object overall formation safety LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overall formation safety | Statement: [Red 1, safetyResponsibility, overall formation safety]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: safetyResponsibility
Context triple: [Red 1, safetyResponsibility, overall formation safety]
  • A. safety
    Indicates that an entity provides, ensures, or is associated with protection from harm, danger, or risk for another entity or within a given context.
  • B. responsibleFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
  • C. establishesLiabilityFor
    Indicates that one party is held legally responsible or accountable for a particular act, omission, or outcome.
  • D. aimsToProtect
    Indicates an intention or purpose to safeguard or defend one entity, value, or condition from harm, risk, or undesirable outcomes.
  • E. publicSafetyAgencyType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of public safety agency associated with an entity (e.g., police, fire, emergency medical services).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493266a2881909daf4c40f719dee8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49f31e70c81909a2ac1d939f7ec07 completed March 1, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d0eade081909c47e85ed55f808d completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.