Triple
T6497128
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ekthesis |
E148785
|
entity |
| Predicate | christologicalIssue |
P46414
|
FINISHED |
| Object | nature and will of Christ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: nature and will of Christ | Statement: [Ekthesis, christologicalIssue, nature and will of Christ]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: christologicalIssue Context triple: [Ekthesis, christologicalIssue, nature and will of Christ]
-
A.
hasChristologicalUse
Indicates that something is used or interpreted in a way that relates specifically to the person, nature, or work of Christ within Christian theology.
-
B.
hasTheologicalIssue
chosen
Indicates that one entity raises, involves, or is associated with a specific theological problem, concern, or point of doctrinal contention in relation to another entity.
-
C.
disputedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, teaching, or belief is contested or not universally accepted between parties.
-
D.
theologicalFocus
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward theological themes, questions, or doctrines.
-
E.
doctrinalConcern
Indicates a relationship where one party has a worry, objection, or issue specifically about the correctness or acceptability of another party’s doctrines or teachings.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687e9ad288190bae5bcac9c8ac855 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c69f386aa08190bfc8592a92ec6339 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c68ab714908190aa7c2fbf64078e15 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:41 p.m.