Triple
T648758
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moses |
E11297
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalContribution |
P17713
|
FINISHED |
| Object | promulgation of the Ten Commandments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: promulgation of the Ten Commandments | Statement: [Moses, legalContribution, promulgation of the Ten Commandments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalContribution Context triple: [Moses, legalContribution, promulgation of the Ten Commandments]
-
A.
legalRepresentation
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
B.
legalAct
Indicates that an entity performs, enacts, or is involved in a formal legal action, measure, or proceeding under a legal framework.
-
C.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
D.
tributeTo
Indicates that one entity is created, given, or dedicated as a mark of respect, admiration, or honor toward another entity.
-
E.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493266a2881909daf4c40f719dee8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49f308f34819094ba28cfc786051e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d0c0dcc8190849211d45489a5a7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a49df0de3c81909721eb391ec94031 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.