Triple

T648026
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Romaniote Jews E11283 entity
Predicate traditionalLanguageScript P454 FINISHED
Object Hebrew script LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hebrew script | Statement: [Romaniote Jews, traditionalLanguageScript, Hebrew script]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalLanguageScript
Context triple: [Romaniote Jews, traditionalLanguageScript, Hebrew script]
  • A. associatedLanguageScript
    Indicates that there is a relationship between a language and the script or writing system used to represent it.
  • B. recognizedAsClassicalLanguageBy
    Indicates that an entity is acknowledged or designated by a specified authority or source as a classical language.
  • C. writingSystem chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the script or system of written symbols used to represent the language or content of another entity.
  • D. isMostWidelyUsedWritingSystem
    Indicates that the subject writing system is used by more people or in more contexts than any other writing system.
  • E. writingSystemDevelopedFrom
    Indicates that one writing system originated, evolved, or was derived from another earlier writing system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493266a2881909daf4c40f719dee8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49f308f34819094ba28cfc786051e completed March 1, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d0c0dcc8190849211d45489a5a7 completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.