Triple

T645140
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sir George Carteret E11223 entity
Predicate roleInColonies P16892 FINISHED
Object proprietary governance of New Jersey LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proprietary governance of New Jersey | Statement: [Sir George Carteret, roleInColonies, proprietary governance of New Jersey]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInColonies
Context triple: [Sir George Carteret, roleInColonies, proprietary governance of New Jersey]
  • A. hasColonialHistoryWith
    Indicates that one entity has a historical relationship of colonization or being colonized involving the other entity.
  • B. colonialOffshoot
    Indicates that one entity originated as a colony or derivative settlement established by another entity.
  • C. wasColonialPower
    Indicates that one entity historically exercised colonial control or dominance over another entity.
  • D. wasColonyOf
    Indicates that one entity functioned as a colony under the political control or administration of another entity.
  • E. formerColonyName
    Indicates that one entity is the historical or previous name used for a colony that later changed its political status or designation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493266a2881909daf4c40f719dee8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49f19f9a08190b0bf6e19b32427ff completed March 1, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d0a0ab481909871461418a00be7 completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a49dc0e6a08190b81d82a6f2571c41 completed March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.