Triple
T642827
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
E16775
|
entity |
| Predicate | holding |
P2237
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeals applied too demanding a standard in denying mandamus relief and failed to properly consider separation of powers concerns in evaluating discovery orders directed at the Vice President and other executive officials. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeals applied too demanding a standard in denying mandamus relief and failed to properly consider separation of powers concerns in evaluating discovery orders directed at the Vice President and other executive officials. | Statement: [Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, holding, The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeals applied too demanding a standard in denying mandamus relief and failed to properly consider separation of powers concerns in evaluating discovery orders directed at the Vice President and other executive officials.]
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4936be1c88190af56540324b57da7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49f03db7481909e49c325c5f7cdae |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.