Triple

T6414529
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Count E127790 entity
Predicate historicallyGoverned P44467 FINISHED
Object county LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: county | Statement: [Count, historicallyGoverned, county]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyGoverned
Context triple: [Count, historicallyGoverned, county]
  • A. historicalRegionGoverned chosen
    Indicates that a subject entity exercised governing authority over a particular historical region during a specified period.
  • B. laterGovernedAs
    Indicates that an entity subsequently held governing authority over another entity at a later time.
  • C. hasHistoricalPolity
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with a political unit or state that existed in the past.
  • D. hasHistoricalGovernmentForm
    Indicates that an entity has, at some point in the past, been governed under a particular form or system of government.
  • E. historicallyPartOf
    Indicates that one entity was formerly a component, region, or subdivision of another entity during a past historical period, but is not necessarily part of it in the present.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0083815208190a9b299b8e0640218 completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c068e6bd3881909b1979de5cdf17fb completed March 22, 2026, 10:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c060f5d4e481909d1366190607b586 completed March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:42 p.m.