Triple

T6388302
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Communicantes E143754 entity
Predicate hasVariantForms P455 FINISHED
Object proper inserts for certain feasts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proper inserts for certain feasts | Statement: [Communicantes, hasVariantForms, proper inserts for certain feasts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVariantForms
Context triple: [Communicantes, hasVariantForms, proper inserts for certain feasts]
  • A. hasVariantReadingsWith
    Indicates a relationship where two textual items are linked because they exhibit differing or alternative readings of (typically) the same underlying content.
  • B. hasVariant chosen
    Indicates that one entity exists as an alternative form, version, or variation of another entity.
  • C. hasVariantSpelling
    Indicates that one term is an alternative spelling form of another term.
  • D. hasDistinctLetterForms
    Indicates that the related writing system or symbol set uses different visual shapes or styles for the same letter in different contexts (such as position, case, or usage).
  • E. hasVariantSystem
    Indicates that one system is an alternative or variant form of another system within the same general framework or category.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008dac1ec81909cef8157ccd69962 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0686b4f34819088ff07185b34e536 completed March 22, 2026, 10:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c060eff524819094cee1c70a0c1ff4 completed March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:34 p.m.