Triple
T63711
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UDP |
E1266
|
entity |
| Predicate | checksumSupport |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | optional checksum in IPv4 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: optional checksum in IPv4 | Statement: [UDP, checksumSupport, optional checksum in IPv4]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: checksumSupport Context triple: [UDP, checksumSupport, optional checksum in IPv4]
-
A.
checkedBy
Indicates that an entity has been examined, verified, or reviewed by another entity.
-
B.
hasSupported
Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity, either materially, emotionally, or through advocacy.
-
C.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
D.
hasCheckAndBalanceFunction
Indicates that one entity performs a checking or limiting role on another entity’s powers, providing oversight and balance within a system.
-
E.
hasCheckAndBalanceWith
Indicates that two entities mutually monitor, limit, or counterbalance each other's powers or actions to prevent dominance or abuse.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24ba4f760819081f6638a3c70538a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24fd16c248190a6ee4cd96c388772 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ea3c44081908fa3856969881d1f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:02 a.m.