Triple
T6344692
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Caribbean Peacekeeping Force |
E142713
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAllegedJustification |
P70099
|
FINISHED |
| Object | threat to regional stability |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: threat to regional stability | Statement: [Caribbean Peacekeeping Force, hasAllegedJustification, threat to regional stability]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAllegedJustification Context triple: [Caribbean Peacekeeping Force, hasAllegedJustification, threat to regional stability]
-
A.
allegedStatus
Indicates that a particular status or condition is claimed or asserted about an entity, but has not been confirmed as true.
-
B.
hasAllegedDate
Indicates that an entity is associated with a date that is claimed or reported, but not confirmed as certain.
-
C.
allegedAction
Indicates that an action is claimed or asserted to have occurred, typically without being proven or confirmed.
-
D.
allegedUse
Indicates that something is claimed or suspected to have been used, without confirming that the use actually occurred.
-
E.
hasNoLegalAuthority
Indicates that an entity lacks the official power, right, or authorization to perform a specified action or make binding decisions in a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008d5ab108190b346c465696824a9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0674702d08190806ef0998960b797 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060ea1a988190889e47b7e0c819b8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0623bb29081908bfdfb84a07ece90 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:31 p.m.