Triple

T6336740
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order E142508 entity
Predicate influencedDebateIn P9239 FINISHED
Object international relations theory LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: international relations theory | Statement: [The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, influencedDebateIn, international relations theory]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: influencedDebateIn
Context triple: [The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, influencedDebateIn, international relations theory]
  • A. influencedDiscussionOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity had an effect on the way another entity was discussed, framed, or debated.
  • B. enteredPoliticalDebateIn
    Indicates that an entity took part in a political debate that occurred in a specified place or context.
  • C. canDebate
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to engage in a debate or argumentative discussion with another entity.
  • D. debatedAs
    Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
  • E. hasDebate
    Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008d4d8e88190ad301c05b08722ac completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0654c63508190b51f7b622388e5ad completed March 22, 2026, 9:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c060e7e2d48190af9d004236466788 completed March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:30 p.m.