Triple

T62955
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Golden Rule E1249 entity
Predicate hasFormulation P3660 FINISHED
Object Treat others as you would like to be treated LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Treat others as you would like to be treated | Statement: [Golden Rule, hasFormulation, Treat others as you would like to be treated]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFormulation
Context triple: [Golden Rule, hasFormulation, Treat others as you would like to be treated]
  • A. hasForm
    Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular shape, structure, or configuration.
  • B. hasFullForm
    Indicates that one entity is the complete, expanded, or unabbreviated form of another entity.
  • C. establishedInCurrentForm
    Indicates the point in time when something took on its present structure, organization, or configuration, distinct from any earlier versions or forms.
  • D. keyFormula
    Indicates that a formula serves as the primary or defining expression associated with an entity or relationship.
  • E. formedBy
    Indicates that something comes into existence or is created as a result of a specific agent, process, or combination of components.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24ba4f760819081f6638a3c70538a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a24fd16c248190a6ee4cd96c388772 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24ea3c44081908fa3856969881d1f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a24fcf5a88819088c5fa4c08476358 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:02 a.m.