Triple
T629464
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hobart |
E15892
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPopulationRankInTasmania |
P17257
|
FINISHED |
| Object | largest city in Tasmania |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: largest city in Tasmania | Statement: [Hobart, hasPopulationRankInTasmania, largest city in Tasmania]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPopulationRankInTasmania Context triple: [Hobart, hasPopulationRankInTasmania, largest city in Tasmania]
-
A.
hasPopulationRank
Indicates the relative position of an entity in an ordered list based on the size of its population.
-
B.
populationRankInQueensland
Indicates the relative position of an entity in terms of population size compared to other entities within Queensland.
-
C.
hasPopulationRankInUK
Indicates the relative position of an entity’s population size compared to other entities within the United Kingdom.
-
D.
hasPopulationRankInCanada
Indicates the relative position of an entity’s population size compared to other entities within Canada.
-
E.
populationRank
Indicates the relative position of an entity in an ordered list based on the size of its population.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4935c131c8190a5378c6bf101e8cc |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49ec051bc8190b3e3f8651a367d77 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d01b29081908be87e4cd7726ff1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a49defe58c8190bd39ef47c9f660a7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.