Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Johnson v. M’Intosh | Statement: [Doctrine of Discovery, appliedInCourtCase, Johnson v. M’Intosh]

Target entity: Johnson v. M’Intosh
Context triple: [Doctrine of Discovery, appliedInCourtCase, Johnson v. M’Intosh]

• A. Johnson v. M’Intosh chosen
  Johnson v. M’Intosh is an 1823 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the doctrine that private individuals could not purchase lands directly from Native Americans, affirming federal supremacy over Indian land transactions and shaping American property and Indigenous land rights law.
• B. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
  Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
• C. Standing Bear v. Crook
  Standing Bear v. Crook was an 1879 U.S. federal court case in which Ponca chief Standing Bear successfully argued that Native Americans are "persons" under the law and entitled to habeas corpus rights.
• D. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
  Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
• E. Dred Scott v. Sandford
  Dred Scott v. Sandford was an 1857 U.S. Supreme Court decision that infamously denied citizenship and constitutional rights to African Americans and helped accelerate tensions leading to the Civil War.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: appliedInCourtCase
Context triple: [Doctrine of Discovery, appliedInCourtCase, Johnson v. M’Intosh]

• A. usedInCourts
  Indicates that something is employed or applied within legal court settings, such as in judicial proceedings or courtroom processes.
• B. appliedInJurisdiction
  Indicates that a rule, decision, or action is put into effect or holds legal force within a specified jurisdiction.
• C. associatedCourtCase chosen
  Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
• D. appearsInCourt
  Indicates that an entity is formally present and participating in a legal proceeding before a court.
• E. affectedCourt
  Indicates that a particular court is impacted or influenced by a specified action, decision, or legal matter.
• F. None of above.