Triple
T624865
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cantor’s paradox |
E14593
|
entity |
| Predicate | holdsIn |
P17841
|
FINISHED |
| Object | naive set theory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: naive set theory | Statement: [Cantor’s paradox, holdsIn, naive set theory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holdsIn Context triple: [Cantor’s paradox, holdsIn, naive set theory]
-
A.
holdsFor
Indicates that a particular relationship or condition remains true over a specified interval or duration of time.
-
B.
heldAs
Indicates that one entity is kept, maintained, or regarded in a particular state, role, or condition by another entity.
-
C.
heldOn
Indicates that an event or activity takes place at a specific time, date, or occasion.
-
D.
heldThat
Indicates that an entity (often a person or authority) maintained, asserted, or concluded that a particular proposition or judgment is true.
-
E.
held
Indicates that one entity physically grasped, carried, or kept another entity in its possession or control.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4934b17c881909ace8270e8ddd202 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49e43002c81908e0c7dab29b75978 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d0069d0819087c83b608f6fc053 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a49e2107548190af0c1d67cfa475d1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.