Triple
T624840
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cantor’s paradox |
E14593
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | result in set theory |
C3334
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: result in set theory Context triple: [Cantor’s paradox, instanceOf, result in set theory]
-
A.
antimony in naive set theory
chosen
Antinomy in naive set theory is a self-contradictory situation arising from unrestricted set formation, where seemingly valid principles lead to paradoxical sets such as the set of all sets that do not contain themselves.
-
B.
set of equations
A set of equations is a collection of mathematical statements, each expressing an equality between expressions, that are considered together—often to be solved simultaneously or analyzed as a group.
-
C.
mathematical theorem
A mathematical theorem is a rigorously proven statement derived from axioms and previously established results, expressing a fundamental truth within a formal mathematical system.
-
D.
result in quantum electrodynamics
A result in quantum electrodynamics is a theoretically derived or experimentally confirmed prediction about how charged particles and electromagnetic fields interact, typically expressed through precise calculations of observable quantities such as scattering amplitudes, cross sections, or radiative corrections.
-
E.
mathematical structure
A mathematical structure is a set (or collection of objects) equipped with specified operations, relations, or properties that satisfy given axioms, providing a framework for studying abstract patterns and relationships.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4934b17c881909ace8270e8ddd202 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.