Triple
T6234984
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Touch It (Remix) |
E139452
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCalloutHook |
P24936
|
FINISHED |
| Object | easy to chant hook |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: easy to chant hook | Statement: [Touch It (Remix), hasCalloutHook, easy to chant hook]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCalloutHook Context triple: [Touch It (Remix), hasCalloutHook, easy to chant hook]
-
A.
hasHook
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, is equipped with, or features a hook in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
holderCalled
Indicates that one entity, acting as a holder or possessor, initiated a phone call or communication to another entity.
-
C.
hasCallInNumber
Indicates that an entity has an associated telephone number designated for receiving incoming calls.
-
D.
calledAs
Indicates that one entity is referred to, named, or addressed by another specific name or label.
-
E.
hasCallingConvention
Indicates that a function or method uses a specific calling convention that defines how arguments are passed and results are returned.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008b0e7ac8190808a59573ee646f3 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c062f103a08190b1fb44234832178e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c05601de6481909d0880048fd7b49a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:22 p.m.