Triple

T62263
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pico de Orizaba E1236 entity
Predicate climbingDifficultyStandardRoute P4582 FINISHED
Object Alpine PD LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alpine PD | Statement: [Pico de Orizaba, climbingDifficultyStandardRoute, Alpine PD]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: climbingDifficultyStandardRoute
Context triple: [Pico de Orizaba, climbingDifficultyStandardRoute, Alpine PD]
  • A. climbingRoute
    Indicates a relationship where a path or sequence of holds is designated for ascending a surface, typically in rock climbing or similar activities.
  • B. climbingSeason
    Indicates the period during which climbing an object, route, or area is typically allowed, feasible, or considered optimal.
  • C. typicalElevationRange
    Indicates the usual range of elevation values within which something commonly occurs or exists.
  • D. firstAscent
    Indicates that an entity represents the earliest known successful ascent or climb of a particular route, peak, or feature.
  • E. hasEasiestRoute
    Indicates that one entity provides or represents the simplest or least difficult route or path to reach another entity or destination.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24ba4f760819081f6638a3c70538a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a251f74b0881909ad89127b8171277 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24ea242c8819086fe00bf01e6523e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a251f6786081908eaaed6190695322 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:02 a.m.