Triple

T621083
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Employment Division v. Smith E14513 entity
Predicate hasSubsequentLegislationInfluenced P3136 FINISHED
Object Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 E5195 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 | Statement: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasSubsequentLegislationInfluenced, Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Context triple: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasSubsequentLegislationInfluenced, Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993]
  • A. Religious Freedom Restoration Act chosen
    The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is a 1993 U.S. federal law that aims to protect individuals’ religious practices from substantial government burdens unless justified by a compelling governmental interest pursued through the least restrictive means.
  • B. Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
    The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is a U.S. federal law that protects individuals, religious institutions, and prisoners from government actions that substantially burden their religious exercise, particularly in land use and institutional settings.
  • C. American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978
    The American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 is a U.S. federal law that recognizes and protects the rights of Native Americans to practice their traditional religions, including access to sacred sites, use of sacred objects, and freedom to worship.
  • D. American Indian Religious Freedom Act Amendments of 1994
    The American Indian Religious Freedom Act Amendments of 1994 are U.S. federal revisions that strengthened protections for Native American religious practices, including the ceremonial use of peyote by members of the Native American Church.
  • E. Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act
    The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act is a U.S. federal law that protects access to reproductive health services by prohibiting the use or threat of force, obstruction, or property damage against clinics, providers, and patients.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubsequentLegislationInfluenced
Context triple: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasSubsequentLegislationInfluenced, Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993]
  • A. relatedLegislation chosen
    Indicates that there exists a legislative document that is connected to, affects, or is otherwise relevant to the subject entity.
  • B. significantLegislation
    Indicates that a piece of legislation has substantial importance or impact within a legal, political, or social context.
  • C. passedLegislation
    Indicates that a governing body has formally approved and enacted a specific piece of legislation or law.
  • D. legalDoctrineInfluenced
    Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
  • E. hasLegislativeSubject
    Indicates that a legislative document, action, or body concerns, addresses, or is about a particular subject or topic.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4934b17c881909ace8270e8ddd202 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49e3e5d80819096e72e11b533f931 completed March 1, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a563c682f88190a2af1087246be4c4 completed March 2, 2026, 10:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49cfe9bc081909a01b4b3b48f03b7 completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.