Triple
T6208018
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Massapequa Park |
E138795
|
entity |
| Predicate | adjacentTo |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Massapequa |
E493369
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Massapequa | Statement: [Massapequa Park, adjacentTo, Massapequa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Massapequa Context triple: [Massapequa Park, adjacentTo, Massapequa]
-
A.
Massapequa
Massapequa is a suburban community on Long Island, New York, known as a residential hub with commuter rail access to New York City.
-
B.
West Natick
West Natick is a residential village and commuter suburb within the town of Natick, Massachusetts, known for its access to Boston via the MBTA commuter rail.
-
C.
Massapequa, New York
chosen
Massapequa, New York is a suburban hamlet on Long Island’s South Shore known for its residential neighborhoods, waterfront access, and role as a commuter community for New York City.
-
D.
East Natick
East Natick is a village-level neighborhood within the town of Natick in Middlesex County, Massachusetts.
-
E.
Westport
Westport is a small coastal town on the West Coast of New Zealand’s South Island, known historically for coal mining and its proximity to rugged natural landscapes.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008ada364819096c9e92c74d639b5 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c062870d5881909b8d4e33ff31a907 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c16f4ce8888190b5cc4f1b091e88f3 |
completed | March 23, 2026, 4:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:20 p.m.