Triple
T6205471
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 45th Canadian federal election |
E138733
|
entity |
| Predicate | willElect |
P6078
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Members of Parliament |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Members of Parliament | Statement: [45th Canadian federal election, willElect, Members of Parliament]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: willElect Context triple: [45th Canadian federal election, willElect, Members of Parliament]
-
A.
canElect
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to choose another entity for a position, role, or office through an election process.
-
B.
will
chosen
Indicates that an entity is going to perform an action or be in a certain state in the future.
-
C.
elects
Indicates that one entity selects or chooses another entity for a position, role, or office, typically through a formal voting process.
-
D.
couldElect
Indicates that one entity has the potential or ability, under certain conditions or rules, to choose another entity for an office, role, or position through an election.
-
E.
voteFor
Indicates that one entity casts or expresses a vote in favor of another entity or option.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008acbea48190991c6b834bb45d65 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0626d96ec8190816c00c44668177d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055fdea3c81908f5d910f0d36234a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:20 p.m.