Triple
T6199872
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Netherlands Commercial Court |
E138601
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseManagement |
P69626
|
FINISHED |
| Object | active judicial case management |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: active judicial case management | Statement: [Netherlands Commercial Court, caseManagement, active judicial case management]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: caseManagement Context triple: [Netherlands Commercial Court, caseManagement, active judicial case management]
-
A.
usesCaseManagementSystem
Indicates that an entity makes use of a case management system to organize, track, or handle cases or workflows.
-
B.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
C.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
D.
associatedCourtCase
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
-
E.
losesCourtCaseTo
Indicates that one party is defeated in a legal proceeding by another party, with the decision rendered in favor of the latter.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008acbea48190991c6b834bb45d65 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c062547cd48190a2715537b961262e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055fbce1081908805fd12e242ab96 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c056c87340819088003f427706ebf8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:20 p.m.