Triple
T6187697
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of the Camel |
E138102
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalProceedings |
P3010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trials of alleged organizers in Egypt |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trials of alleged organizers in Egypt | Statement: [Battle of the Camel, legalProceedings, trials of alleged organizers in Egypt]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalProceedings Context triple: [Battle of the Camel, legalProceedings, trials of alleged organizers in Egypt]
-
A.
legalProcedureUsed
Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
-
B.
relatedLegalProcess
Indicates that there is an associated legal proceeding or action that is connected to, arises from, or is otherwise relevant to the referenced entity or event.
-
C.
hasLegalProceeding
chosen
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
D.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
E.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a8fd408190b7ec6e42934974a6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06217be288190997032c8c4839fa5 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055fa0a808190bda37832e3ac150c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:19 p.m.