Triple
T6165890
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barron v. Baltimore |
E137556
|
entity |
| Predicate | overruledInPracticeBy |
P15321
|
FINISHED |
| Object | selective incorporation cases under the Fourteenth Amendment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: selective incorporation cases under the Fourteenth Amendment | Statement: [Barron v. Baltimore, overruledInPracticeBy, selective incorporation cases under the Fourteenth Amendment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: overruledInPracticeBy Context triple: [Barron v. Baltimore, overruledInPracticeBy, selective incorporation cases under the Fourteenth Amendment]
-
A.
overturnedPractice
chosen
Indicates that a previously established practice, rule, or precedent has been reversed or invalidated by a later decision or action.
-
B.
wasOverturnedByCourt
Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
-
C.
overturnedLaw
Indicates that a previously established law has been invalidated or reversed, typically by a higher legal authority or court decision.
-
D.
overturnedDecisionOf
Indicates that one decision reversed, nullified, or set aside a previous decision.
-
E.
overturnedInPartBy
Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or outcome has been partially reversed or modified by a later authority or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a54fc88190b6ce4416490ca79d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05d6225bc819097707be620681e7b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055f5b81481908819515cdc334ae6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:17 p.m.