Triple

T6165811
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Malloy v. Hogan E137554 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Miranda v. Arizona E8268 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miranda v. Arizona | Statement: [Malloy v. Hogan, relatedCase, Miranda v. Arizona]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Miranda v. Arizona
Context triple: [Malloy v. Hogan, relatedCase, Miranda v. Arizona]
  • A. Miranda v. Arizona chosen
    Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.
  • B. Mapp v. Ohio
    Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
  • C. New York v. Quarles
    New York v. Quarles is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda warning requirement, allowing certain unwarned statements to be admitted when needed to protect public safety.
  • D. Strickland v. Washington
    Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
  • E. Illinois v. Gates
    Illinois v. Gates is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "totality of the circumstances" test for determining whether an informant’s tip provides probable cause for issuing a search warrant.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008a54fc88190b6ce4416490ca79d completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c05d6225bc819097707be620681e7b completed March 22, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c141a3ea6c81908847998960c9d0eb completed March 23, 2026, 1:35 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:17 p.m.