Triple

T6154445
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject bengoshi E137283 entity
Predicate writesSystem P69491 FINISHED
Object Japanese writing system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Japanese writing system | Statement: [bengoshi, writesSystem, Japanese writing system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: writesSystem
Context triple: [bengoshi, writesSystem, Japanese writing system]
  • A. writesTo
    Indicates that one entity produces and records information, data, or content into another entity as a destination or storage target.
  • B. writingSystemStatus
    Indicates the current functional or sociolinguistic state of a writing system, such as whether it is actively used, obsolete, official, or endangered.
  • C. writingSystemScope
    Indicates the range or extent of content, languages, or contexts to which a particular writing system applies or is used.
  • D. writtenTo
    Indicates that something has been addressed or directed in written form to a particular recipient.
  • E. writingSystem
    Indicates that one entity is the script or system of written symbols used to represent the language or content of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008a45d008190832a9e19f5d63406 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c05d01ddb0819085b5f5338b86a25d completed March 22, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c055f39e0881909ae56444b1b48929 completed March 22, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c056c87340819088003f427706ebf8 completed March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:17 p.m.