Triple

T61473
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Puerto Rican Spanish E1221 entity
Predicate hasNotableWord P4548 FINISHED
Object boricua LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: boricua | Statement: [Puerto Rican Spanish, hasNotableWord, boricua]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableWord
Context triple: [Puerto Rican Spanish, hasNotableWord, boricua]
  • A. hasNotableSubject
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
  • B. hasNotableFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
  • C. hasNotableMember
    Indicates that a group, organization, or collection includes at least one member who is distinguished or noteworthy in some significant way.
  • D. notableFor
    Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
  • E. hasSignificantLanguage
    Indicates that an entity possesses a language that plays an important or primary role in its communication, identity, or functioning.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24ba4f760819081f6638a3c70538a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a251f74b0881909ad89127b8171277 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24ea242c8819086fe00bf01e6523e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a251f6786081908eaaed6190695322 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:02 a.m.